2002年高考作文题目.doc

2002年高考作文题目 中新网北京7月7日消息：2002年全国普通高校招生考试今天拉开帷幕。以下是备受关注的今年高考语文卷作文题： 有一位登山者，途中遇到暴风雪，他深知如果找不到避风之处必死无疑。他走啊走，突然脚下碰到一个僵硬的东西，他扒开雪地一看，原来是一个冻僵的人，他心想：是救他呢还是继续前行？经过心灵翻江倒海的思量之后，他决定救这个人。于是，他脱下手套，开始给那个冻僵的人全身按摩。经过一番努力，终于把他救醒了。于是，两人搀扶着走出雪地。也许人人不一定能够碰到这样的生死抉择，但是我们生活中也会面临一些与触动心灵有关的选择，在这种情况下，我们应该怎样选择？为什么会作这样的选择？ 请以“心灵的选择”为话题写一篇作文，范围不要超出这个内容之外： 1、立意自定 2、文体自选 3、题目自拟 4、不少于800字 5、不得抄袭 阅读下面材料，根据要求作文。总分60分 几个同学看了一场世界杯足球赛，兴致勃勃地聊起规则问题。 同学甲：规则太重要了。运动员不守规则，裁判不公正执法，就不会有精彩的比赛！同学乙：对！没规则不成。没有校规，没有交通规则，成吗？ 同学丙：可有时不守规则的占了便宜，守规则的反倒吃了亏呢。 同学乙：那是另外一回事。 同学丁：不过规则也不是死的，要是不合适，就得改。现在许多“游戏”规则不都修改了吗？ 请以“规则”含“规则与??”为话题，自行立意，自拟题目，写一篇不少于800字的作文。除诗歌外，文体不限。 也许你曾到过海边，也许你在荧屏、银幕上见过大海??请以“面对大海”为题，写一篇1000字左右的文章。文体不限不要写成诗歌。 2016年江苏语文高考作文题目 阅读下面的材料，按照要求作文。 慈母手中线，游子身上衣。 临行密密缝，意恐迟迟归。孟郊 为什么我的眼里常含泪水？ 因为我对这土地爱得深沉。艾青 在这些神圣的心灵中，有一股清明的力量和强烈的爱，像激流一般飞涌出来。甚至无须倾听他们的声音，就在他们的眼里，他们的事迹里，就可看到生命从没像处于忧患时的那么伟大，那么丰满，那么幸福。罗曼？罗兰 请以“忧与爱”为题，写一篇不少于800字文章。 要求：①立意自定；②角度自选；③除诗歌外，文体自选。 历年江苏语文高考作文题汇总 2016年江苏语文高考作文题目 不避平凡，不可平庸。为人不可平庸，平庸则无创造，无发展，无上进；处世不可平庸，因此要有原则，有鉴识，要坚守。 请以“拒绝平庸”为题，写一篇不少于800字的文章。要求：1、立意自定；2、角度自选；3、不必面面俱到；4、除诗歌外，文体自选。 2016年江苏语文高考作文题目 绿色，生机勃勃，赏心悦目。绿色，与生命、生态紧密相连。今天，绿色成为崭新的理念，与每个人的生活息息相关。请以“绿色生活”为题写一篇不少于800字的文章。要求：①角度自选；②立意自定；③除诗歌外，文体自选。 2016年江苏语文高考作文题目 时尚表现为语言、服装、文艺等新奇事物在一定时期内的摩仿与流传。各种时尚层出不 穷。其间好与坏，雅与俗，美与丑，各种观点交错杂陈。创新与摩仿永不停息地互动。有的如过眼云烟，有的能积淀为经典。 请以“品味时尚”为题目，写一篇文章。要求：①自选角度，自行立意。②除诗歌外，文体不限。③不少于800字。 xx年江苏语文高考作文题目 有些人只是在童年有过好奇心，有些人一生都能保持好奇心。质疑、发现、智慧、高尚、惊 喜、快乐、烦恼、平庸……这中间的每个词都有可能像影子一样跟在好奇心的后面。请以“好奇心”为题写一篇不少于800宇的文章。要求：①角度自选；②立意自定；③除诗歌外，文体自选。 xx年江苏语文高考作文题目 人人头顶一方天，每个人的生活都与天空相连。每个人的心中都有一片天空。明净的天空，辽阔的天空，深邃的天空，引人遐思，令人神往。 请以“怀想天空”为题目写一篇不少于800字的文章。要求：立意自定，诗歌除外，文体不限。 xx年江苏语文高考作文题目 有人说：世界上本无路，走的人多了，也便有了路。有人说：世界上本有路，走的人多了，也便没了路。还有人说：…… 请以“人与路”为题写一篇文章。要求：1.自定立意。 2.除诗歌外文体不限。3.不少于800字。 xx年江苏语文高考作文题目 我们常常用古人所说的“凤头、猪肚、豹尾”六字来谈写作，意思是开头要精彩亮丽，中间要充实丰富，结尾要响亮有力。写作固然如此，仔细想想，小到生活、学习，大到事业、人生，又何尝不该这样呢？ 请以“凤头、猪肚、豹尾”为话题，写一篇不少于800字的文章。注意：①话题包括三个 方面，也可以选取其中一个或两个方面展开。②自定立意。③自拟标题。④自选文体，但不要写成诗歌或剧本。? xx年江苏语文高考作文题目 水有水的性格 灵动，山有山的性情 沉稳。水的灵动给人以聪慧，山的沉稳给人以敦厚。然而，灵动的海水却常年保持着一色的蔚蓝，沉稳的大山却在四季中变化出不同的色彩。请以“水的灵动，山的沉稳”为话题，写一篇不少于800字的文章。 [注意]①话题包括两个方面，可以只写一个方面，也可以兼写两个方面。②立意自定。③文体自选。④题目自拟。⑤不得抄袭。 xx年江苏语文高考作文题目 宋国有个富人，一天大雨把他家的墙淋坏了。他儿子说：“不修好，一定会有人来偷窃。”邻居家的一位老人也这样说。晚上富人家里果然丢失了很多东西。富人觉得他儿子很聪明，而怀疑是邻居家老人偷的。以上是《韩非子》中的一个寓言。直到今天，我们仍然可以在现实生活中听到类似的故事，但是，也常见到许多不同的甚至相反的情况。我们在认识事物和处理问题的时候，感情上的亲疏远近和对事物认知的正误深浅有没有关系呢？是什么样的关系呢？ 请就“感情亲疏和对事物的认知”这个话题写一篇文章。 2002年江苏语文高考作文题目 有一位登山者，在途中遇上暴风雪。他深知不尽快找到避风处，非冻死不可。他走啊走啊，腿已经迈不开了。就在这时，脚碰到一个硬邦邦的东西，扒开雪一看，竟然是个快冻僵的人。登山者犯难了：是继续向前，还是停下来援救这个陌生人？心灵深处翻江倒海之后，他毅然作出决定，脱下手套，给那个人做按摩。经过一番按摩，陌生人可以活动了，而登山者也因此暖和了自己的身心。最后，两个人互相搀扶着走出了困境。也许不是人人都会碰上这种生死的抉择，但是每个人却常常遇到、见到、听到一些触动心灵需要作出选择的事情。那时，我们大家是怎样选择的呢？又应该如何选择呢？ 请以“心灵的选择”为话题写一篇作文，所写内容必须在这个话题范围之内。 2002年高考英语满分作文 作文题目 最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论。讨论的主题是：公园要不要收门票?请你根据下表所提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论情况。 注意：1．信的开头已为你写好。 2．词数：100左右。 3．参考词汇：门票 entrance fee Dear Editor． I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks． 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. 60% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee do not meet people’s expectations, for a park is considered to be a place where the public can have a good time when they are not busy either at home or at work. If an entrance fee must be paid by the visitors for a park,it will be necessary to build a gate and surrounding walls. In the end a city will take on a bad look. 40% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee can be accepted, but it must not be too expensive. The money from ticket selling can be used for paying the gardeners in the park and buying some other kinds of flowers and trees. With regard to myself, I think an entrance fee is useful, for it can be used to protect a park. Do we share the same opinion, dear editor? Yours truly, Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should not be bought before one enters a park, for it is a place for the public to go to whe n they are free. If a ticket must be bought, a gate and walls have to be built for a park, which will make a city look ugly. Forty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should be bought before one enters a park, but that the price of the ticket should be reasonable. Money that is got from ticket selling can be used to pay the gardening workers and buy different kinds of flowers and trees. As for myself, I really think parks are good places to go to at weekends and on holidays. At the same time, we, as visitors, should pay the entrance fee when we enter a park. After all, it takes a lot of money to maintain a park in good working order. Do you agree with me, dear editor? Yours truly,Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee should not be forced on the public. They believe parks are the place where the public enjoy themselves at their leisure. They think that a gate and wails are to be built if an entrance fee is to be charged. The city will not look so beautiful as it should have. Forty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee is OK, but it shouldn’t be out of control. Entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new types of flowers and trees. For myself, I’d like to say that if we all work hard to build our city into a flower garden, who cares about the entrance fee for parks? Yours truly, Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Those against charging entrance fee for parks take up 60%. They are of one mind that parks are a place for the public’s enjoyment. If tickets are demanded on the visitors of a park, a gate has to be set up and so have the walls on the four sides. If so, city will not look as beautiful as it would. Otherwise, those in favour of charging entrance fee for parks take up 40%. They all think that ticket price should be controlled properly, and that entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new sorts of flowers and trees. The truth lies in the hands of the majority. Does my argument stand to reason, dear editor? Yours truly, Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Of all us who have joined in the discussion, 60% share the point of view that an entrance fee should not be charged while 40% share the opposite view. Those who don’t agree with the idea think that a park is a place where the public can spend their spare time for pleasure. Those in support of the idea think that entrance fee for parks can’t be beyond control. Those against the idea think that a city’s appearance will be damaged because a gate and wails will be built if an entrance fee is to be collected. Those who agree with the idea think entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new kinds of flowers and trees. I think it does more good than harm to charge an entrance fee for parks. Am I right, editor? Yours truly,Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Those who are for consider it of great necessary to charge an entrance fee for the admission of parks. These people take up forty percent. They all see eye to eye that an entrance fee is what must be charged,but that it shouldn’t be beyond the buying power of the citizens. Part of the money collected from charging entrance fee can be made use of to pay the gardeners and to buy new flowers and trees. Those who are against consider that a park is a public place for people to enjoy themselves after work or on holiday. They are afraid that if an entrance fee is to be charged, a gate and walls will have to be built, thus affecting the appearance of a city. As far as I am concerned, I do wish one day we would end up having to pay an entrance fee for parks. Will that day be far? Yours truly,Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of us hold the opinion that parks can go very well without an entrance fee charged. Parks are places for the leisure of the public. In case an entrance fee is necessary, a gate and walls are to be built, which might do harm to the city’s look. Forty percent of us hold the o pinion that an entrance fee is anything but unnecessary, and that tickets shouldn’t be too dear. The money made from entrance fee charge can be used for paying the gardening workers and buying new flowers and trees. For my part I believe an entrance fee is something that we cannot go without at present. After all, china is a developing country and our government is not able to provide this service for the time being. I hope our country will become stronger and stronger until one day every citizen goes to the park without having to pay. Yours truly, Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. We students have very different opinions about it. 60% of us think that an entrance fee is not necessary. The reason is that it is a place that public to enjoy themselves. If an entrance fee is to be charged, a gate and wails have to be made. In this way the city will not look beautiful. 40% of us think that an entrance fee should be charged, but it must be limited in price. The income from selling tickets can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new flowers and trees. I’m in favour of the first idea because parks should be used to serve the public. Yours truly,Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of us students are against the practice of the charging of entrance fee. As is known, they say, a park is set up for the interests of the common people. If every citizen has to buy a ticket to enter a park, fewer and fewer people will go there. What’s more, the selling of tickets means the building of a gate and walls, which does a great harm to the beauty of a city. Forty percent of us students are for the practice of the charging of entrance fee. They think there are reasons for tickets to be sold. However, tickets shouldn’t be too expensive. The ticket selling money can be used to pay gardeners and buy new flowers and trees. These are the two groups of ideas as far as ticket selling of a park is idea carries more weight? I’d like to know your opinion about it, dear editor. Yours truly,Li Hua 满分作文 Dear editor, I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of us students think that there should be no entrance fee for the public because parks are places for them to take a rest. If an entrance fee is required of every citizen,a gate and surrounding walls become necessary. That will affect the image of the city. Forty percent of us students think that an entrance fee should be charged, but it shouldn’t be too much. Entrance fee can be used to pay gardeners’salaries and buy new flowers and you can see our opinions about entrance fee are very the best of my knowledge, parks should be a place for the pleasure and enjoyment of the general public. As long as the public don’t mind paying, we shouldn’t worry too much about entrance fee. Am I right, dear editor? Yours truly, Li Hua